<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kings Move Above .500 Mark After 3-1 Win Over Minnesota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Views on the Los Angeles Kings and the National Hockey League  by Gann Matsuda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gann Matsuda</title>
		<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gann Matsuda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frozenroyalty.net/?p=1569#comment-1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What SHOULD be and what IS are two different things...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What SHOULD be and what IS are two different things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGSmall</title>
		<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JGSmall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frozenroyalty.net/?p=1569#comment-1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree with your statement on Special Teams, I disagree with the terminology. Special Teams SHOULD be the term for any time you use combinations and tactics different from standard 5 on 5. Certainly that non-standard definition would include both teams in a pulled goalie situation and might even be extended to both teams during a delayed penalty.

As a player and defenseman, I know that when a penalty is delayed I look to crash the net (at our level the forwards seldom look to the points during that play). I also know that when the goalie is pulled, I think less about defense and a lot more about creating havok in the offensive zone. If the other team has pulled their goalie and is in our zone I worry about the high slot a little more and soften my outlet passes so that if they don&#039;t connect I do not get an icing call. I also know that we try to have specific personnel on during a goaltender pulled situation. That sounds like &quot;special teams&quot; to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with your statement on Special Teams, I disagree with the terminology. Special Teams SHOULD be the term for any time you use combinations and tactics different from standard 5 on 5. Certainly that non-standard definition would include both teams in a pulled goalie situation and might even be extended to both teams during a delayed penalty.</p>
<p>As a player and defenseman, I know that when a penalty is delayed I look to crash the net (at our level the forwards seldom look to the points during that play). I also know that when the goalie is pulled, I think less about defense and a lot more about creating havok in the offensive zone. If the other team has pulled their goalie and is in our zone I worry about the high slot a little more and soften my outlet passes so that if they don&#8217;t connect I do not get an icing call. I also know that we try to have specific personnel on during a goaltender pulled situation. That sounds like &#8220;special teams&#8221; to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gann Matsuda</title>
		<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gann Matsuda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frozenroyalty.net/?p=1569#comment-1609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doughty played and was effective.

The Wild weren&#039;t great, but the Kings also put in a very solid effort. The Kings were the better team overall, at even strength or on special teams.

Actually, special teams only refers to when a team is on the power play or is killing a penalty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doughty played and was effective.</p>
<p>The Wild weren&#8217;t great, but the Kings also put in a very solid effort. The Kings were the better team overall, at even strength or on special teams.</p>
<p>Actually, special teams only refers to when a team is on the power play or is killing a penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGSmall</title>
		<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JGSmall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frozenroyalty.net/?p=1569#comment-1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to record the game so I could watch it, but either FSN was blacked out on ATT or I just lost signal.

Did Doughty play? He left early in the St Louis game - if he did play was he effective?

The score indicates a strong defensive game where your game plan overrides the oppositions game plan. Was that your feel or did the Wild just not show up?

Since all goals were during special teams play (pulled goalie is still special teams), what was the overall feel of the 5 on 5?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to record the game so I could watch it, but either FSN was blacked out on ATT or I just lost signal.</p>
<p>Did Doughty play? He left early in the St Louis game &#8211; if he did play was he effective?</p>
<p>The score indicates a strong defensive game where your game plan overrides the oppositions game plan. Was that your feel or did the Wild just not show up?</p>
<p>Since all goals were during special teams play (pulled goalie is still special teams), what was the overall feel of the 5 on 5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gann Matsuda</title>
		<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gann Matsuda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frozenroyalty.net/?p=1569#comment-1607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their last two games, the Kings allowed one goal on eight times shorthanded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their last two games, the Kings allowed one goal on eight times shorthanded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bobson</title>
		<link>http://frozenroyalty.net/2008/12/14/kings-move-above-500-mark-after-3-1-win-over-minnesota/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Bobson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frozenroyalty.net/?p=1569#comment-1606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great win and good to see the PP clicking recently.  I wonder what the PK is ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great win and good to see the PP clicking recently.  I wonder what the PK is ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

